• Users Online: 215
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 30-34

The prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia


1 Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission27-Jul-2019
Date of Decision15-Mar-2020
Date of Acceptance16-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication26-Nov-2020

Correspondence Address:
Tariq Almudhaiyan
Cornea and Refractive Surgery Consultant, Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-4534.301297

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: To determine the prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted targeting healthy Saudi adults (20–40 years old) at two major gatherings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from December 2018 to January 2019. Refractive errors were measured, and data pertaining to age, sex, region of origin, and spectacle use was collected. Clinically significant myopia was defined as SE ≥ -0.50 D, hyperopia as SE ≥ 0.50D, and astigmatism as cylindrical error ≥ 0.50D. Refractive error measurements were assessed using Topcon's Auto-Kerato-Refractometer, KR-800.
Results: A total of 660 adult individuals (1,319 eyes) were included in this study, of which 321 participants (48.7%) were found to be myopes, 167 subjects (25.2%) were hyperopes, and 438 individuals (66.3%) had astigmatism. With regards to correlations, myopia was highly correlated with being male (P-value = 0.036), belonging to age group 20–25 years (P-value = 0.033), originating from the northern regions of Saudi Arabia (P-value <0.001). Similarly, hyperopia was significantly correlated with being male (P-value = 0.048), age groups 20–25 years (P-value = 0.04), and 31–35 years (P-value = 0.011) and was higher in people from northern region (P-value = 0.011). In contrast, astigmatism was only found to be correlated with age group 36–40 years (P-value = 0.002). Additionally, 71.7% of myopic participants and 76.1% of astigmatic individuals opted not to wear spectacles (P-value <0.001).
Conclusion: In this study, the refractive error with the highest prevalence among Saudis was astigmatism, followed by myopia and hyperopia. Gender, region of origin, and spectacle wear were all observed to be highly correlated with higher rates of refractive error.

Keywords: Astigmatism, auto-kerato-refractometer, hyperopia, myopia, refractive errors


How to cite this article:
Almudhaiyan T, Alhamzah A, AlShareef M, Alrasheed A, Bashir R, Alluhidan A, Al-Hazazi M, Aldebasi T. The prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2020;34:30-4

How to cite this URL:
Almudhaiyan T, Alhamzah A, AlShareef M, Alrasheed A, Bashir R, Alluhidan A, Al-Hazazi M, Aldebasi T. The prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 30];34:30-4. Available from: http://www.sjo.org/text.asp?2020/34/1/30/301297




  Introduction Top


Globally, uncorrected refractive errors (such as myopia, hyperopia, presbyopia, and astigmatism) is thought to be the second most leading causeof blindness[1]. It is estimated that over 108 million individuals worldwide are affected by uncorrected refractive errors[2].

Many studies have estimated and documented the prevalence of refractive errors across different settings, regions, and healthcare systems. For instance, studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of myopia among adults to be 14.9% in Taiwan, 41.8% in Japan, 33.1% in the United States, 30% in Canada, 48.1% in Indonesia, 22.9% in China, 34.6% in India, 36.5% in Pakistan, and 28.6% in Singapore[3],[4],[5],[6],[7].

However, with regards to Saudi Arabia, very few studies have been conducted that accurately estimate the prevalence of refractive errors. Moreover, most of these studies were hospital-based and focused on children and adolescents as their target population. For instance, a study by Dr. Rowaily demonstrated that in preschool children attending King Abdul-Aziz medical city, 2.5% of children had myopia, 2.5% had astigmatism, and 2.1% had hyperopia[8]. Similarly, another study found that 4.5% of primary school Saudi children experienced myopia, 1.5% had hyperopia, and 6.5% had astigmatism[9]. However, data is minimal with regards to studies pertaining to the prevalence of refractive errors among adults in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, realizing the paucity of data on adults, in this study we aimed to assess the prevalence of refractive errors in adults in Riyadh.


  Methods Top


Design and setting

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study aimed to estimate the prevalence of refractive errors amongst adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Currently, Riyadh serves as the capital city of Saudi Arabia, and is also the largest city in the country with a population of approximately seven million.

In order to accomplish our objectives, we sought to question Saudi adults during two gatherings that took place in Riyadh city from November 13th, 2018 - January 10th, 2019. The first data collection was done at Alhamra mall, whereas the second data collection was conducted at Aljenadriah festival, a 21-day festival that involves approximately 20,000 participants each day.

In this study, clinically significant myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent (SE) of ≤-0.50D, whereas hyperopia was defined as SE >0.50D and astigmatism was defined as SE = 0.50D. Emmetropia was defined as SE <-0.5 to <+0.50D.

Participants

All Saudis between the ages of 20 to 40 years without any prior history of ocular diseases or procedures were eligible to be included in this study. Subjects from non-Saudi origins, keratoconus patients, patients with a history of any prior ocular intervention, or participants wearing contact lenses within the past two weeks of data collection, were examined but deemed ineligible for inclusion in this study. Assuming the population of Saudi adults between the ages of 20–40 in Riyadh are 1,656,711 according to the latest estimation by the general authority of statistics (2017) and with a confidence interval of 95% and a margin of error of 5% a minimum of 385 participants is needed.

Demographics data, such as age, gender, region, and history of ocular disease, among others, was obtained from the participants using paper collection sheets. All participants signed an ethical consent that was approved by the research ethics committee at King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) in Riyadh. Trained physicians, residents, and medical students were involved with the data collection and sampling.

Instrument

Refractive error, central corneal thickness measurement, spherical power, cylindrical power, astigmatism axis, and spherical equivalent were all measured by Topcan's Kerato-refractometer (KR-800).

Statistical analysis

Baseline demographics were expressed as means with standard deviations (SD) or counts and percentages. Age of participants was subcategorized into groups: 20–25, 26–30, 31–35 and 36–40 years. Variations were measured between different sexes, regions, and age groups. Finally, correlations were investigated between the baseline characteristics and myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism individually. Statistical significance was set at 0.05 level, and all analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC).


  Results Top


In total, there were 660 adults included in this study, predominantly comprising of males (54%). The mean age of the participants was 28 years old, with more than half of participants (56.1%) originally being from the central regions of Saudi Arabia. In total, 662 (50.2%) right eyes and 657 (49.8%) left eyes were examined. Of the 660 participants included in this study, 273 (20.7%) of participants wore spectacles regardless of their refractive error. [Table 1] illustrates the baselines characteristics of the patients included in this study. An eye of one patient was excluded because the patient had keratoconus.
Table 1: Demographics of Participants

Click here to view


With respect to refractive error, 321 (48.7%) individuals experienced myopia, while 167 (25.2%) participants had hyperopia, and 438 (66.3%) people had astigmatism. 185 (28.0%) individuals were found to be emmetropes.

We also assessed the correlation between each refractive error and the baseline characteristics. Myopia was found to be more prevalent among males when compared to females (51.2% vs. 48.8%. P-value = 0.03). Furthermore, 40% of the myopic participants were between 20–25 years (P = 0.03), and 14.5% of myopic patients were originally from the northern regions of Saudi Arabia (P < 0.001). Lastly, the data suggested that 71.7% of myopic participants opted not to wear spectacles for their myopia (P < 0.001) [refer to [Table 2]].
Table 2: The correlation between myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism with demographics of participants

Click here to view


Similarly, several factors were found to be significantly associated with hyperopia. These included male sex (P = 0.048), being in the age groups of 20–25 years old (P = 0.04) and 31–35 years old (P = 0.01), as well as being from the northern region of Saudi Arabia (P = 0.01) [Table 2].

Lastly, astigmatism was associated with more older individuals (35 – 50 years old, P = 0.002). Furthermore, we found that 76.1% of astigmatic individuals opted not to wear spectacles for their astigmatism (P < 0.001) [Table 2].


  Discussion Top


In this study, 660 participants were screened in order to determine the prevalence of refractive error among Saudi adults. We found that age, sex, and region of origin were factors that were found to be closely associated with refractive errors and that most participants did not wear spectacles to correct their refractive error.

Multiple studies have reported the prevalence of refractive errors within Saudi Arabia[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]. However, most of these studies had primary school children and adolescents as their population of interest[8],[9],[11]. With regards to refractive errors among Saudi adults, data is minimal and have methodological issues, such as small sample size. In this study, we were able to overcome this limitation by including 660 adults from various age groups and regions, ensuring the study was robustly powered.

Myopia

The literature suggests that myopia is the most common type of refractive error worldwide[14]. In our study, we found that 48.7% of Saudi adults experience myopia. This contrasts with Western countries, who report a much lower prevalence of myopia. For instance, 19.4% of the population in Norway, 14.2% in Greece, 16.7% in France, 21.2% in Netherlands, 31.9% in Germany, and 21% in USA were found to be myopes. This difference could be attributed to disparities in clinical definitions for myopia. We defined clinically relevant myopia as <-0.50D, whereas authors from Western countries defined clinically relevant myopia to be <1.00 D[6],[15].

With that being said, our results were far more consistent with has been reported in Asian countries. For example, 41.8% of the Japanese population were found to be myopic, 48.1% in Indonesia, 41.8% in South Korea, 34.6% in India, 36.5% in Pakistan, and 53.7% in Jordan[15],[16].

Furthermore, we also found that myopia is more commonly related with being male. This is consistent with some of the scientific literature[17],[18]. However, studies conducted by Ziaei et al. and Wong et al. demonstrate myopia to be more common among women[19],[20].

Moreover, we also observed that myopia was more commonly seen among participants aged between 20–25 years. This is consistent with what AlRashidi et al. reported with regards to Saudi medical students[12]. However, a meta-analysis conducted by Pan et al. on age-specific myopic prevalence in Asians demonstrated a directly proportional relationship with age[21].

Hyperopia

In this study, we found that 25.7% of Saudi adults had some degree of hyperopia. This is significantly higher than what has been previously reported in other studies. For instance, Al-Rashidi et al. found that only 6.5% of Saudi medical students suffered from hyperopia[12]. This disparity in finding can be attributed to different definitions of hyperopia (>0.50 D in our study vs. >1.00 D in other studies).

In particular, our results suggest that Saudi adults from the region of Qassim have a higher prevalence of hyperopia when compared to other regions of the kingdom. This is consistent with the literature, as other studies have estimated a prevalence of 20.9%-35.9% for hyperopia among adults from the region of Qassim[11],[12].

Astigmatism

Our data suggests that 66.3% of Saudis experience some degree of astigmatism. This is a much higher prevalence than most other countries worldwide. For instance, 32.4% of people in Bangladesh have astigmatism, 35.7% in South Africa, 32.3% in German, 36.8% in Jordan, 59.7% in Brazil, 4.4% in Rwanda, and 14.3% in Iran[15],[18],[22].

Corrective measures

Despite the high prevalence of refractive errors among Saudis, our data demonstrated 71.7% of myope's, 81.7% of hyperopes, and 76.1% of people who experienced astigmatism, opted not to wear spectacles to correct their refractive error.

There are several limitations to this study. First, our study was limited by context, as sampling was conducted at only two sites. However, these two sites were major attractions for locals and visitors from all over Saudi Arabia. Second, we did not adjust for any confounding factors, as no multivariate analyses was performed. Lastly, this study might not be geographically generalizable to other cities within Saudi Arabia.


  Conclusion Top


In conclusion, our study found that astigmatism (66.3%) was the most prevalent refractive error among Saudis, followed by myopia (48.7%) and then hyperopia (25.2%). In addition, refractive error was found to be correlated with age, as myopia was more prevalent in younger subjects whereas astigmatism was higher among older people. Lastly, all 3 refractive errors - myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism - were found to be more prevalent among males than females, and more prevalent in the Northern regions of Saudi Arabia.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank the executives of Aljenadriah festival and Alhamra Mall for their cooperation and support. We also wish to express our appreciation to many colleagues and medical students for their valuable efforts during the campaign. Special thanks to Ms. Donita Mina for her assistance with the campaign and study official procedures.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Dandona R, Dandona L. Refractive error blindness. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:237-43.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Naidoo KS, Leasher J, Bourne RR, et al. Global vision impairment and blindness due to uncorrected refractive error, 1990-2010. Optom Vis Sci 2016;93:227-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000796.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012;32:3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00884.x.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tan C, Chan Y, Wong TY, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors and ocular biometry parameters in an elderly Asian population: The Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study (SLAS). Eye. 2011;25:1294. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.144.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pateras E. Prevalence of refractive errors amongst adults, located at the north suburbs of Athens-Greece. Health Science Journal. 2012;6:102.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL, Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1111-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.8.1111.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:614-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300539.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Al-Rowaily MA. Prevalence of refractive errors among pre-school children at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;24:45-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.01.001.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Rowaily A, Alanizi B. Prevalence of Uncorrected Refractive Errors among Adolescents at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Riyadh. Saudi Arabia. J Clinic Experiment Ophthalmol 2010;1:114. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9570.100011 4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Al-Shaaln FF, Bakrman MA, Ibrahim AM, Aljoudi AS. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment among Saudi adults attending primary health care centers in northern Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2011;31:473-80. https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.84624.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Al Wadaani FA, Amin TT, Ali A, Khan AR. Prevalence and pattern of refractive errors among primary school children in Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia. Global journal of health science. 2013;5:125.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Al-Rashidi SH, Albahouth AA, Althwini WA, Alsohibani AA, Alnughaymishi AA, Alsaeed AA, et al. Prevalence refractive errors among medical students of Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: Crosssectional descriptive study. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2018;6:940. 10.5539/gjhs.v5n1p125  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Alsaif BA, Aljindan MY, Alrammah HM, Almulla MO, Alshahrani SS. Refractive errors among Saudi college students and associated risk factors. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ). 2019;13:437. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S193213.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sherwin JC, Hewitt AW, Coroneo MT, Kearns LS, Griffiths LR, Mackey DA. The association between time spent outdoors and myopia using a novel biomarker of outdoor light exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:4363-70. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8677.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Lou L, Yao C, Jin Y, Perez V, Ye J. Global patterns in health burden of uncorrected refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:6271-7. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20242.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mallen EA, Gammoh Y, Al-Bdour M, Sayegh FN. Refractive error and ocular biometry in Jordanian adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:302-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00306.x.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Prema R, George R, Ve RS, et al. Comparison of refractive errors and factors associated with spectacle use in a rural and urban South Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:139.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, Huq DMN, Johnson GJ. Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: Results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1150-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.046.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2486-94.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ziaei H, Katibeh M, Solaimanizad R, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors; the yazd eye study. Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. 2013;8:227.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Pan C-W, Dirani M, Cheng C-Y, Wong T-Y, Saw S-M. The age-specific prevalence of myopia in Asia: A meta-analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2015;92:258-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000516.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of current ophthalmology. 2018;30:3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009.  Back to cited text no. 22
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Prevalence of Refractive Errors among Children in Saudi Arabia: A Systemic Review
Waleed Alghamdi
The Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2021; 15(1): 89
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1097    
    Printed18    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded79    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]